Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fine-structure constant inverse is 1/α ≅ 137.036. Both the Nobel Prize winners, Pauli and Feynman, became fascinated by the number 137; anyhow, physicists have not yet found any relation between such number and any other physical law. Here the integer 137 has several clear meanings, on the bases of the following two premises: 1) Form of light: longitudinal massive particles (photons) having length λ = c/v with v their frequency, namely the number of photons, of the same ray (continuous succession of photons), crossing a given observer in a time unit. 2) Electron structure: its charge is not uniformly distributed, but it can be considered as a point particle fixed on the electron spherical surface and facing the atom nucleus during the electron orbits; the electron charge also corresponds to the photons-electron impact point, where photons are absorbed and released. On the above bases, on H atom we found the following main results: n = 1, 2, ..137 electron different circular orbits with n 2 the number of admitted photons along two equal circular orbits; v=αc electron charge ground-state (g-s) orbital speed; r= α/4πR H electron charge g-s orbit, with R H the Rydberg constant; v = c/137 exact, electron g-s orbital speed. As for the claimed fall of circling electrons into their nucleus due to their supposed photons emission, we found that the electrons are emitting the previously absorbed photons only during their spiral path toward lower orbits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".