Production of high quality green textile filaments from carboxymethylated cellulose covalently cross‐linked by reactive green 19 dye
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Huge quantities of wastewaters are produced during dyeing of textile, which is why wastewater treatment plants are required in textile industries in which, in most cases, non‐dyed filaments are produced first and dyeing of these filaments is performed at a later stage. Here, carboxymethylated cellulose (CMC) with the COOH group content of 1.3 mmol/g CMC was covalently crosslinked through reactive green 19 dye in the dope solution (0.09 wt% dye with reference to CMC) from which green textile filaments were spun. The incorporation of dye in the dope solution has the advantage of obtaining dyed filaments without using an additional step for dying of the fabricated textile filaments and, moreover, it can be done in such a way that clean, no dye containing wastewater is produced. The filaments also demonstrated an increase in mechanical strength (tenacity ~ 0.96 cN/dtex) and a decrease in water absorbency (water absorbency ~ 0.63 g water/g filament) due to chemical crosslinking of cellulose chains through the dye. Owing to covalent bond formation between the CMC and the dye, excellent color fastness properties were obtained for the fabricated filaments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it