MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4282027859 · doi:10.2118/209708-ms

Effect of Surface Wettability on the Miscible Behaviors Of Co2-Hydrocarbon in Shale Nanopores

2022· article· en· W4282027859 on OpenAlexaff
Dong Feng, Zhangxin Chen, Z. H. Zhang, Peihuan Li, Yu Chen, Keliu Wu, Jing Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanoporeWettingHydrocarbonOil shaleWork (physics)Hydrocarbon mixturesMaterials scienceContact angleChemical engineeringSurface tensionScalingChemical physicsChemistryThermodynamicsNanotechnologyComposite materialOrganic chemistryGeologyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The minimum miscible pressure (Pm) of CO2-hydrocarbon mixtures in nanopores is a key parameter for CO2-enhanced shale oil recovery. Although the miscible behaviors of CO2-hydrocarbon mixtures in nanopores have been widely investigated through the simulations and calculations, the heterogeneity of shale components with different affinity to hydrocarbons results in the deviation of traditional predictions and motivates us to investigate how the surface properties influence the CO2-hydrocarbon miscible behaviors in nanopores. In this work, we established a model and framework to determine the wettability-dependent physical phenomena and its impact on the Pm of CO2-hydrocarbon in shale nanopores. First, a generalized scaling rule is established to clarify the potential correlation between critical properties shift and wettability based on the analysis of microscopic interactions (fluid-surface interactions and fluid-fluid interactions). Second, a wettability-dependent SKR EOS is structured and a generalized and practical framework for confined phase behavior with different surface wettability is constructed. Subsequently, the Pm of CO2-hydrocarbon mixtures in confined space with various wettability is evaluated with our model. The calculated results demonstrate that the nanoconfined effects on Pm not only relate to the pore dimension but also depend on the contact angle. In an intermediate-wet nanopore, the minimum miscible pressure approaches the bulk value. In an oil-wet nanopore with a width smaller than 100nm, the minimum miscible pressure is suppressed by the confined effects, and the reduction is further strengthened with a reduction in pore dimension and increase of wall-hydrocarbon affinity. Our work uses a macroscopically measurable parameter (contact angle) to characterize the shift of critical properties derived from the microscopic interactions, and further construct a generalized and practical framework for phase behavior and minimum miscible pressure determination in nanopores with different surface properties. The method and framework can make a significant contribution in the area of upscaling a molecular or nanoscale understanding to a reservoir scale simulation in shale gas/oil research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis→French-language works237,207→