MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282034793 · doi:10.1142/s1088424622500341

Sequential electron transfer in a bis(styryl)BODIPY-aluminum(III) porphyrin – naphthalenediimide reaction center mimic

2022· article· en· W4282034793 on OpenAlexaff
Niloofar Zarrabi, Noah Holzer, Gary N. Lim, Christopher O. Obondi, Art van der Est, Francis D’Souza, Prashanth K. Poddutoori

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Porphyrins and Phthalocyanines · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersUniversity of Minnesota Duluth
KeywordsChemistryTriad (sociology)PorphyrinElectron transferPhotochemistryAcceptorPyridineElectron acceptorPhotoinduced electron transferElectron donorCrystallographyPhotosynthetic reaction centreCatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photoinduced electron transfer properties are reported for a triad composed of a central aluminum(III) porphyrin (AlPorF[Formula: see text] with a secondary electron donor, bis-triphenylaminoborondipyrromethene (TPA 2 -BDP) attached covalently to AlPorF 3 , and an electron acceptor, pyridine-appended naphthalenediimide (NDI), attached by coordination of the pyridine group to the AlPor on the opposite face. Excitation of either the AlPorF 3 or BDP-TPA 2 in the triad results in a two-step electron transfer leading to (TPA 2 -BDP)[Formula: see text]-AlPorF 3 -NDI[Formula: see text] as the final charge-separated species. The electron transfer is investigated using the steady-state fluorescence spectroscopy and time-resolved EPR spectroscopy. The behavior of the triad is compared to that of a previously reported triad in which the NDI acceptor was replaced with C[Formula: see text]. The two triads have virtually identical energetics, but the reorganization energies of the acceptors are known to be very different. The spectroscopic data show that the final charge-separated state is formed in both triads despite the large difference in the reorganization energy associated with the acceptors. This suggests that the ability to perform sequential electron transfer does not depend strongly on the properties of the final acceptor, provided that secondary electron transfer can outcompete recombination in the initial charge-separated state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Porphyrins and PhthalocyaninesSame topicPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine ChemistryFrench-language works237,207