MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282042457 · doi:10.1111/gwmr.12533

Multiple Lines of Evidence for Estimating NSZD Rates Overlying a Shallow LNAPL Source Zone

2022· article· en· W4282042457 on OpenAlexafffund
Anne Wozney, Ian Hers, Krista Stevenson, Calista Campbell, Nick Nickerson, Colleen Gosse

Bibliographic record

VenueGroundwater Monitoring & Remediation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsImperial Oil (Canada)BGC Engineering (Canada)
FundersImperial Oil Limited
KeywordsTransectVadose zoneEnvironmental scienceSoil gasHydrology (agriculture)PiezometerSoil scienceTemperature gradientAcreAtmospheric sciencesGeologySoil waterGroundwaterMeteorologyGeotechnical engineeringAquiferOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Quantitative methods of monitoring natural source zone depletion (NSZD) via biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons (PHC) are required to investigate source zone longevity and guide long‐term management of PHC impacted sites. Vadose zone NSZD processes can be monitored using analysis of surficial CO 2 effluxes, soil‐gas gradients, and thermal gradients. This study describes an applied research and development program conducted at a former refinery site over a 4‐year period (2015 to 2019) on quantitative technologies for evaluation of NSZD of PHC light nonaqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) present within a shallow soil zone. A multiyear study using discrete CO 2 efflux measurements from dynamic closed chambers was compared with estimates obtained using static traps and continuous monitoring using forced diffusion (FD) technology. Thermistor strings along a transect were used to monitor hourly thermal gradients and assess NSZD rates using the temperature gradient method. Discrete soil‐gas data were used to quantify the vertical oxygen gradient to estimate NSZD rates using the concentration gradient method (CGM). Results of discrete and continuous monitoring methods provide estimates of monthly NSZD rates that range seasonally from 80 to 1300 US gal/acre/year using radiocarbon corrected CO 2 efflux method for decane (C 10 H 22 ) equivalent, 120 to 1600 US gal/acre/year using CGM (for wet to dry conditions) and 400 to 2000 US gal/acre/year using the temperature gradient method. Both seasonal temperature and precipitation fluctuations contribute to variability in rates. Continuous methods are shown to provide for improved resolution of temporal variability and seasonal estimates, although discrete methods provide for improved spatial quantification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.328
Threshold uncertainty score0.594

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGroundwater Monitoring & RemediationSame topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsFrench-language works237,207