SAĞLIK BAKIM HİZMETLERİ ALANINDA YAPILAN INOVASYON KONULU MAKALELERİN BİLİM HARİTALAMA TEKNİKLERİYLE ANALİZİ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Öz: Bu çalışmanın temel amacı sağlık bakım hizmetleri alanında yapılan inovasyon konulu makalelerin bilim haritalama teknikleri ile incelemektir. R tabanlı Bibliometrix ve VOSviwer yazılımları kullanılarak, en etkili yazar, ülke, kurum ve dergiler tespit edilmiştir. Bir arama staretisi ile 1975-2019 yılları arasındaki Web of Science makaleleri Core koleksiyondan indirilmiş ve Bibliyometrix ve VOSviwer yazılımları ile analiz edilmiştir. Sadece bir yazılım ile inceleme yapılmamasının en büyük sebebi ise her bir yazılımın öne çıktığı ve diğer yazılımlarda olmayan karşılaştırmalı üstünlüktür. İnovasyon konusunda en çok makale yayınlayan ülkeler arasında ABD, Kanada, İngiltere, Hollanda ve Fransanın yer aldığı ve Health Policy dergisinin bu konuda en fazla makale yayınlayan dergi olduğu yapılan analizler sonucunda ortaya çıkmıştır. Ayrıca h ve g indeksleri en yüksek yazar Weiner olarak tespit edilmiştir. Teknolojik gelişmelerin etkisi ile ortaya çıkan sağlık inovasyonundaki gelişmeler, hasta yaşam beklentisini ve yaşam kalitesini başarılı bir şekilde arttırmaktadır. Sağlık bakım hizmeleri alanında sunulan bakım, tedavi ve teşhis birçok konuda verimliliği arttırdığından maliyetlerin azalmasına ve insan hatalarını minimize etmeye yardımcı olmaktadır. Yapılan bu çalışma ile klinisyenler, sağlık hizmeti sağlayıcıları-tedarikçiler, araştırmacılar, politika yapıcılar, karar vericiler ve hastalar ortaya çıkan verilerin analizinden elde edilen yeni bilgiler ışığında yeni fırsatlar elde edebileceklerdir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Sağlık Bakım Hizmetleri, İnovasyon, Bibliyometrik Analiz. Abstract: The main purpose of this study is to examine the innovation articles in the field of health care services with science mapping techniques. Using R-based Bibliometrix and VOSviwer software, the most influential authors, countries, institutions and journals were determined. Web of Science articles between 1975 and 2019 were downloaded from the Core collection with a search engine and analyzed with Bibliometrix and VOSviwer software. The biggest reason for not reviewing with only one software is the comparative advantage in which each software stands out and is not available in other software. It has emerged as a result of the analysis that the USA, Canada, England, Netherlands and France are among the countries that publish the most articles on innovation, and that the Health Policy journal is the journal that publishes the most articles on this subject. In addition, the h and g indexes were determined as the highest author Weiner. Developments in health innovation, which emerged with the effect of technological developments, successfully increase patient life expectancy and quality of life. Care provided in the field of health care services; As it increases efficiency in many areas such as treatment and diagnosis, it helps to reduce costs and minimize human errors. With this study, clinicians, healthcare providers-suppliers, researchers, policy makers, decision makers and patients will be able to gain new opportunities in the light of new information obtained from the analysis of the emerging data. Keywords: Health Care Services, Innovation, Bibliometric Analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".