Ozonolysis Lifetime of Tetrahydrocannabinol in Thirdhand Cannabis Smoke
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thirdhand smoke (THS) describes the persistent contamination on indoor surfaces following smoking. Cannabis THS is a chemically distinct form of THS which remains poorly characterized, relative to tobacco. Understanding its fate is necessary to mitigate exposure to cannabis smoke components and potentially harmful transformation products. In this work, the heterogeneous reaction of surface-bound Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), a component of cannabis smoke, with ozone was examined. Cannabis smoke deposits were collected inside a Teflon chamber on glass, cotton, and tile surfaces. Samples were exposed to high (100 ppb) and realistic indoor ozone concentrations (20 ppb) inside a flow tube and to low ozone levels (2 to 29 ppb) present in a genuine indoor environment. Chemical transformations were monitored by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), with epoxide and dicarbonyl products detected. Rapid initial loss of THC was observed on all surfaces, but a small fraction (5%–10%) persisted for extended time scales. A short loss lifetime (a few hours) was observed for THC deposited on glass and tile under typical indoor ozone exposures, leading to almost complete loss at longer times. THC decay on cotton was approximately five times longer than on glass, with up to 10% of THC remaining after 1 week of exposure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it