MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282822040 · doi:10.2147/jmdh.s361896

Pandemic Responsiveness in an Acute Care Setting: A Community Hospital’s Utilization of Operational Resources During COVID-19

2022· article· en· W4282822040 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jesse R. McLean, Cathy Clark, Aidan McKee, Suzanne Legue, Jane Cocking, A Lamarche, Corey Heerschap, Sarah E. Morris, Tracey Fletcher, Corey McKee, K. Kennedy, Leigh Gross, Andrew Broeren, Matthew Forder, Wendy Barner, Chris Tebbutt, Suzanne Kings, Giulio DiDiodato

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDisaster Response and Management
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityImpactRoyal Victoria Regional Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStaffingPreparednessPersonal protective equipmentMedicineNursingThematic analysisWorkforceMedical emergencySurge CapacityBusinessQualitative researchCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Political science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: To ensure continuity of services while mitigating patient surge and nosocomial infections during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, acute care hospitals have been required to make significant operational adjustments. Here, we identify and discuss key administrative priorities and strategies utilized by a large community hospital located in Ontario, Canada. Methods: Guided by a qualitative descriptive approach, we performed a thematic analysis of all COVID-19-related documentation discussed by the hospital’s emergency operation centre (EOC) during the pandemic’s first wave. We then solicited operational strategies from a multidisciplinary group of hospital leaders to construct a narrative for each theme. Results: Seven recurrent themes critical to the hospital’s pandemic response emerged: 1) Organizational structure : a modified EOC structure was adopted to increase departmental interoperability and situational awareness; 2) Capacity planning : Design Thinking guided rapid infrastructure decisions to meet surge requirements; 3) Occupational health and workplace safety : a multidisciplinary team provided respirator fit-testing, critical absence adjudication, and wellness needs; 4) Human resources/workforce planning : new workforce planning, recruitment, and redeployment strategies addressed staffing shortages; 5) Personal protective equipment (PPE) : PPE conservation required proactive sourcing from traditional and non-traditional suppliers; 6) Community response : local partnerships were activated to divert patients through a non-referral-based assessment and treatment centre, support long-term care and retirement homes, and establish a 70-bed field hospital; and 7) Corporate communication : a robust communication strategy provided timely and transparent access to rapidly evolving information. Conclusion: A community hospital’s operational preparedness for COVID-19 was supported by inter-operability, leveraging internal and external expertise and partnerships, creative problem solving, and developing novel tools to support occupational health and community initiatives. Keywords: COVID-19, pandemic, infection, hospital, acute care, operational

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.764
Threshold uncertainty score0.475

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0210.011
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Multidisciplinary HealthcareSame topicDisaster Response and ManagementFrench-language works237,207