MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282834829 · doi:10.1093/cdn/nzac066.010

Challenges in Health Care, Diet and Nutrition in Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome

2022· article· en· W4282834829 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michaelann S. Wilke, Mahua Ghosh, Donna F. Vine

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian function and disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePrediabetesOverweightReferralObesityPolycystic ovaryHealth careType 2 diabetesFamily medicineDiseaseMetabolic syndromeDiabetes mellitusGerontologyInternal medicineInsulin resistanceEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS), the most common endocrine-metabolic disorder in women, is associated with a higher incidence of obesity, metabolic syndrome, Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease. The recommended first line targets are diet, lifestyle and behaviour in managing body weight and adverse health outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess the health status, health care experience and supports related to nutrition and lifestyle in people with PCOS. Respondents completed a retrospective survey online between Jan 2021-Jan 2022 and included Alberta (Canada) residents who self-reported a diagnosis of PCOS (n = 145). The survey was based on previous validated health and quality of life surveys in PCOS, expanded, and re-validated in PCOS patients and health care providers in Alberta. Themes of questions on diagnosis, referral to health care providers, health concerns, diet and nutrition were analyzed. The majority of respondents were aged 26 to 45 yrs of age (84%), self-reported overweight or obesity (96%) and were residents of Alberta for > 10 years (85%). In 34% of respondents a diagnosis of PCOS took > 2 years, and 60% reported visiting more than one healthcare provider before a final PCOS diagnosis. Many respondents (75%) were not informed of the health risks associated with PCOS. Following a PCOS diagnosis, 23% were diagnosed with high blood cholesterol and 25% with prediabetes or diabetes. Most respondents (> 80%) were not referred to a Registered Dietitian or other health care provider to manage PCOS symptoms and cardiometabolic risk factors. A lack of nutrition knowledge was reported as a major barrier to losing weight (38%), however the most common barriers cited were stress (75%) and negative feelings (60%). A priority recommendation by respondents to improve their health care included better education in diet-nutrition. This data provides evidence for the need to develop preventative health care strategies to improve overall health, referral and access to diet-nutrition counseling in this high-risk PCOS population in Alberta, Canada. Women and Children’s Health Research Institute.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.656
Threshold uncertainty score0.693

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Developments in NutritionSame topicOvarian function and disordersFrench-language works237,207