MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282837658 · doi:10.1093/cdn/nzac061.048

Long-Term Mortality Implications of Maternal Weight Change in Pregnancy

2022· article· en· W4282837658 on OpenAlexaff
Stefanie N. Hinkle, Sunni L. Mumford, Katerine Grantz, Pauline Mendola, James Mills, Edwina Yeung, Anna Z. Pollack, Sonia M. Grandi, Yan Qiao, Rajeshwari Sundaram, Enrique F. Schisterman, Cuilin Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPregnancyMedicineBody mass indexObstetricsHazard ratioWeight gainInterquartile rangeWeight changeProportional hazards modelNational Death IndexGestational ageBirth weightDemographyConfidence intervalWeight lossObesityInternal medicineBody weight

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High pregnancy weight gain is associated with greater postpartum weight retention; yet the long-term implications remain unknown. We examined associations of pregnancy weight change with mortality after ∼50 years of follow-up. The Collaborative Perinatal Project (CPP) Mortality Linkage Study linked maternal participants in the CPP, a prospective pregnancy cohort (1959–1965), to the National Death Index and Social Security Death Master File for vital status through 2016 (n = 46,042). Total gestational weight change (gain or loss) in the index pregnancy (last CPP singleton pregnancy) was the difference in recorded delivery weight and self-reported pre-pregnancy weight. All-cause and cause-specific mortality associations with quintiles of gestational weight change were estimated using Cox regression adjusting for index pregnancy age, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), race, parity, smoking, marital status, income, education, site, study year, prior chronic conditions, and gestational week at delivery. Majority of women (69%) had a healthy pre-pregnancy BMI and 46% were White and 45% were Black. Median (interquartile range) total gestational weight change was 9.5 kg (6.4–12.2), respectively; 2.5% lost weight in pregnancy. Over a median follow-up of 52 years (IQR 45–54), 38.9% of women died. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for mortality across quintiles 1 to 5 were 1.07 (95% CI 1.01–1.12), 1.03 (0.98–1.09), 1.00 (Reference), 1.01 (0.96–1.07), and 1.09 (1.03- 1.14), respectively. Compared to the middle quintile, HRs for the top four causes of death, cancer, cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, and diabetes for the first quintile were 1.20 (0.99–1.46), 1.05 (0.96–1.15), 1.14 (0.96–1.37), and 0.92 (0.72–1.17), respectively; HRs for the fifth quintile were 1.19 (0.98–1.45), 1.14 (1.03–1.27), 0.95 (0.78–1.14), and 1.52 (1.20–1.92) respectively. This study's novel findings extend the importance of healthy pregnancy weight gain beyond the pregnancy window to women's long mortality risk, particularly from cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes. This work was funded by the Intramural Research Program of the NICHD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Developments in NutritionSame topicGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207