Selenium Speciation in Paired Whole Blood and Serum Samples From Pregnant Bangladeshi Women
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We aimed to characterize the relative concentrations of selected major selenium (Se) species in paired whole blood (WB) and serum samples collected from pregnant women at delivery in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Speciation analysis enabled differentiation of organic and inorganic Se, and quantification of the nutritionally bioactive reduced selenometabolite, selenoneine, which has been previously observed in WB from populations with high levels of fish consumption. Paired WB and serum specimens (n = 515) were collected at delivery among participants of the Maternal Vitamin D for Infant Growth trial. Quantification of total serum Se and total WBSe was conducted using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Speciation analyses were conducted in a subset of pairs (n = 20) to quantify selenometabolites using liquid chromatography coupled to ICP-MS at the University of Cincinnati. Concentrations of inorganic Se (IV), selenoneine, selenocysteine (SeCys), selenomethioneine (SeMet) were expressed as % of total Se. We assessed concordance between results generated across laboratories using paired t-tests. Overall (n = 515), mean (SD) serum Se and WBSe concentrations (μg/L) were 70 (14) and 135 (18), respectively, such that average Serum Se as a proportion of WBSe was 52%. Findings were similar in the speciation subset (n = 20) [total Serum Se: 82 (19); total WBSe: 138 (18), with a ratio of serum Se to WBSe: 60%]. Sums of quantified species accounted for most of the total serum Se (72 (10); 88% of total) and WBSe (135 (16); 98%). Organic forms were predominant in both serum and WB: SeCys: 15 (2) and 20 (3); and SeMet: 54 (9) and 92 (13), respectively. Selenoneine was detected in WBSe at mean concentrations of 24 (5) μg/L. Together, SeMet and selenoneine accounted for 85% of the additional WBSe not present in serum. Inorganic Se was not detected in WB but comprised 5% of serum. Approximately half of the Se in whole blood is in the cellular fraction. SeMet was enriched in WB and the most abundant form, relative to selenoneine which was not found in serum. Small amounts of inorganic serum Se may be artifactual due to freeze-thaw related degradation. These findings require confirmation in other settings but suggest that serum Se may not be a suitable biomarker of population status. BMGF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".