MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282840819 · doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100942

The impact of parent involvement on improving participation of children born preterm: The story in the baseline

2022· article· en· W4282840819 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueContemporary Clinical Trials Communications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfant Development and Preterm Care
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Psychological interventionIntervention (counseling)Baseline (sea)PopulationMedicinePsychologyGerontologyDevelopmental psychologyEnvironmental healthNursingPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Preterm birth continues to be a major public health challenge that has long term consequences on participation into adulthood. However, little is known about effective interventions to improve the participation of children born preterm. Methods: This study gathered initial evidence on the usefulness of a goal-focused, environmental-based approach (Pathways and Resources for Engagement and Participation (PREP)) in improving the participation of children born preterm, and living in Ireland. Three school-age boys (6-7 years old) with a history of preterm birth participated in the 12-week PREP intervention. A 36-week single-subject AB design was employed and replicated across 3 different participation goals within each child and across 3 children. Activity performance was measured repeatedly, through parental involvement, using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), providing 9 individual outcome trajectories. Visual inspection and mixed-effects segmented regression were used. Results: Goals were selected from various participation domains and settings. Throughout the baseline phase, once goals were set, significant improvements in activity performance were observed for all participants (t = 14.06, p < 0.001). Further clinically significant improvements (2.58 on the COPM) for all 9 participation goals were seen in overall performance during the intervention phase. These changes remained at follow-up. Conclusions: Findings support family-centered practice and draw attention to the power of goal setting in improving participation within this context. Challenges with single-subject design with this population were also highlighted. Results demonstrate the potential impact of parent involvement when using an environmental-based approach to improve the participation of this underserved population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.032
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0320.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.370
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.118 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it