MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282841521 · doi:10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107303

Ileal lactobezoar in extreme premature infant complicated by intestinal perforation

2022· article· en· W4282841521 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Elkhouli, Farid Aleali, Ayah Alzamrooni, Priscilla Chiu, Estelle B. Gauda

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Surgery Case Reports · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNecrotizing enterocolitisLaparotomyPerforationSurgeryIleostomyComplicationShock (circulatory)Stoma (medicine)PediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Lactobezor is a rare complication that has been reported more in the stomach, however it may be located anywhere in the intestine. CASE REPORT: Reported here, is a case of ileal lactobezoar which was complicated by perforation and was mimicking necrotizing enterocolitis in presentation, ex preterm (26 weeks) male infant who presented at day of life 18th (2 days after BM fortification) with hemodynamic instability and intestinal perforation, which was diagnosed by Abdominal X-ray and Ultrasound necessitating urgent laparotomy. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Laparotomy revealed an area of ileal perforation and an inspissated mass which was confirmed to be lactobezoar by pathology, ileostomy was performed. The baby had an acute postoperative status of hypovolemic shock which was managed clinically, then was restarted on feeds, and the stoma was reversed 9 weeks later. CONCLUSION: Lactobezoar, although rare, but numbers increased especially with the rise in numbers of extremely preterm infants worldwide, it most commonly presents later in life but in some cases, such as our case it may happen in 1st 2-3 weeks after birth and may cause significant complications as perforation making its differentiation from common GI problems in neonates as NEC more challenging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score0.941

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Surgery Case ReportsSame topicIntestinal and Peritoneal AdhesionsFrench-language works237,207