Abstract 5942: Vitamin D, calcium supplement use and the risk of breast cancer in <i>BRCA1</i> and <i>BRCA2</i> mutation carriers: A case-control study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: Use of vitamin D and calcium-containing supplements are associated with a decreased risk of breast cancer among women in the general population. Whether this association exists among women at a high-risk due to a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation is not known. Thus, we conducted a case-control study to evaluate the association between vitamin D and/or calcium supplement use and the risk of breast cancer among BRCA mutation carriers. Methods: BRCA mutation carriers enrolled in a longitudinal study, that collected information on cancer history and lifestyle factors, were invited to complete a supplemental questionnaire on past supplement use. Vitamin D and calcium supplement use were categorized as never or ever use. Total average daily vitamin D and calcium use was stratified as never, moderate, or high intake based on tertiles. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of invasive breast cancer associated with supplement use. Analyses were stratified by BRCA mutation type and menopausal status at breast cancer diagnosis. Results: This study included 134 cases and 276 controls. Compared to never users, ever vitamin D or calcium-containing supplement use was associated with decreased odds of breast cancer (OR=0.54; 95%CI 0.31, 0.91; P=0.02 for vitamin D; OR=0.61; 95%CI 0.36, 1.05; P=0.07 for calcium). The protective effect of vitamin D and calcium was stronger for those with the highest intake of each supplement (OR=0.44; 95% CI 0.22, 0.89; P=0.02 for vitamin D; OR=0.55; 95% CI 0.28, 1.08; P=0.08 for calcium), compared to never use. For vitamin D use, findings were significant among premenopausal women while for calcium use, the inverse associations were stronger among postmenopausal women. Findings were also significant for BRCA1 mutation carriers only, however, stratified analyses were limited by small strata. Conclusions: Although based on a relatively small sample, our findings suggest a potential protective effect of vitamin D and calcium-containing supplement use for breast cancer among high-risk women. Future studies with larger samples and prospective study design are warranted. Citation Format: Emma Guyonnet, Shana J. Kim, Cindy X. Zhang, Jeanna McCuaig, Susan Armel, Steven A. Narod, Joanne Kotsopoulos. Vitamin D, calcium supplement use and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: A case-control study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5942.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".