MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Progesterone for Prevention of Miscarriage and Preterm Birth in Women With First-Trimester Bleeding: PREEMPT Trial [A260]

2022· article· en· W4282919426 on OpenAlexaff
Haim A. Abenhaim, François Audibert, Robert Gagnon, Isabelle Girard, Zina Kellow, Stephanie Klam

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrics and Gynecology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMiscarriageObstetricsPregnancyGestationVaginal bleedingPlaceboGynecologyRandomized controlled trialAbortionLive birthRandomizationSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: First-trimester bleeding is associated with miscarriage and preterm birth, for which progesterone has been suggested to improve outcomes. Our study objective was to evaluate the effect of progesterone treatment throughout pregnancy on preventing miscarriage and preterm birth in pregnancies with first trimester bleeding. METHODS: This was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial comparing 200 mg micronized progesterone, vaginally administered nightly from presentation to 34 weeks of gestation, with an identically appearing placebo. Subjects with vaginal bleeding and live intrauterine pregnancy <14 weeks of gestation were eligible. Multifetal gestations, cervical insufficiency, recurrent pregnancy loss, or bleeding unrelated to placentation were excluded. Primary outcome was occurrence of live term pregnancy. Secondary outcomes included adverse maternal/newborn events and time to miscarriage or birth. Chi-square analyses compared proportions and Mann-Whitney tests compared time-to-event outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 549 patients were randomized, of whom 16 withdrew or were lost to follow-up, leaving 264 patients in the progesterone group and 269 patients in the placebo group. Baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. The number of patients having a live term birth among those in the progesterone group was 197 (74.6%), compared with 190 (70.6%) in the placebo group (P=.30). Compared to the placebo group, those in the progesterone group had comparable risks of abortion <20 weeks (38 (14.4%) versus 43 (16.0%), P=.94), preterm birth (27 [10.2%] versus 33 [12.3%], P=.46), and stillbirth (2 [0.9%] versus 3 [1.3%], P=.65). There were no differences in adverse maternal or newborn outcomes, or in time-to-event for miscarriage or birth between the groups. CONCLUSION: Progesterone prescribed throughout pregnancy is not effective in preventing miscarriage or prematurity in subjects presenting with first-trimester vaginal bleeding in context of a live intrauterine pregnancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetrics and GynecologySame topicEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and ManagementFrench-language works237,207