MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282921652 · doi:10.1093/gbe/evac091

Mitochondrial Phylogenomics of <i>Cuscuta</i> (Convolvulaceae) Reveals a Potentially Functional Horizontal Gene Transfer from the Host

2022· article· en· W4282921652 on OpenAlexafffund
Qianshi Lin, Arjan Banerjee, Saša Stefanović

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome Biology and Evolution · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Parasitism and Resistance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCuscutaBiologyHorizontal gene transferPlastidPhylogenomicsMitochondrial DNANuclear genePhylogeneticsGenomeGenePhylogenetic treeGeneticsParasitic plantConvolvulaceaeEvolutionary biologyHost (biology)BotanyChloroplastClade

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Horizontal gene transfers (HGTs) from host or other organisms have been reported in mitochondrial genomes of parasitic plants. Genes transferred in this fashion have usually been found non-functional. Several examples of HGT from the mitochondrial genome of parasitic Cuscuta (Convolvulaceae) to its hosts have been reported, but not vice versa. Here we used 31 protein-coding mitochondrial genes to infer the phylogeny of Cuscuta, and compared it with previous nuclear and plastid phylogenetic estimates. We also investigated the presence of HGTs within these lineages. Unlike in plastid genomes, we did not find extensive gene loss in their mitochondrial counterparts. Our results reveal the first example of organellar HGT from host to Cuscuta. Mitochondrial atp1 genes of South African subgenus Pachystigma were inferred to be transferred from Lamiales, with high support. Moreover, the horizontally transferred atp1 gene has functionally replaced the native, vertically transmitted copy, has an intact open reading frame, and is under strong purifying selection, all of which suggests that this xenolog remains functional. The mitochondrial phylogeny of Cuscuta is generally consistent with previous plastid and nuclear phylogenies, except for the misplacement of Pachystigma when atp1 is included. This incongruence may be caused by the HGT mentioned above. No example of HGT was found within mitochondrial genes of three other, independently evolved parasitic lineages we sampled: Cassytha/Laurales, Krameria/Zygophyllales, and Lennooideae/Boraginales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenome Biology and EvolutionSame topicPlant Parasitism and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207