Cognitive Impairment Leads to Increased Feelings of Sexual Obligation Among a National Longitudinal Sample of Sexually Active Adults Aged 62 and Older
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We work from a gendered life-course perspective to examine the relationship between cognitive impairment and feelings of sexual obligation among U.S. older adults. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data are drawn from 2 rounds of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (2010/2011 and 2015/2016). The analytic sample includes 575 sexually active respondents aged 62-86 at baseline. Cognitive impairment is measured using a survey-adapted version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, with categories of normal, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia. We estimate cross-lagged models to test the potential reciprocal relationships between cognitive impairment and feelings of sexual obligation. RESULTS: Older adults with dementia at baseline had significantly higher odds of sexual obligation 5 years later than their peers with normal cognition at baseline, after adjusting for gender, race/ethnicity, education, income, age, marital status, self-rated health, depression, comorbidities, and sexual obligation at baseline. We find no evidence of a reciprocal relationship, as sexual obligation at baseline did not predict later cognitive status. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Older adults with dementia often remain sexually active after their 60s, and many of them feel obligated to have sex with their partner. Our study highlights the importance of understanding the context of their sexual lives. The quality of their sexual relationship, such as whether they feel a duty to maintain their earlier sexual activity or please their partner, and the health implications of sexual obligation should be considered alongside the increase of older adults with dementia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".