MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282932160 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-3047

Abstract 3047: Investigating the interaction between the microbiome and mutant p53 in Li-Fraumeni Syndrome

2022· article· en· W4282932160 on OpenAlexaff
Noel Ong, Camilla Giovino, Nicholas W. Fischer, Pamela Psarianos, David Malkin

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLi–Fraumeni syndromeContext (archaeology)MicrobiomeCancerGermline mutationPopulationMedicineCancer researchGermlineLung cancerImmunologyOncologyBiologyMutationInternal medicineBioinformaticsGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS) is a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome in which affected individuals are prone to developing a wide spectrum of malignancies. LFS is caused by germline mutations in the TP53 tumour suppressor gene. LFS patients develop cancer significantly earlier than the general population and may experience multiple malignancies in their lifetime. Studies have indicated that environmental influences like radiation exposure and tobacco smoke may further increase cancer risk in LFS patients. Currently, there is no cure for LFS, and screening for early tumour detection is the standard of care for LFS patients. Recently, microbes have been found to be involved in cancer development, progression, and treatment responsiveness. Moreover, microbes have anti-tumourigenic properties that can be harnessed for therapeutic intervention. The interaction between microbes and cancer can be through contact-dependent, contact-independent, and/or immunological interactions. Profiling the microbiome in the context of cancer may provide prognostic and/or diagnostic options for patients. However, interactions between the microbiome and mutant p53 in LFS has not been studied to date. We induced dysbiosis using a combination of antibiotics in LFS mice harbouring the heterozygous Trp53 R172H mutation. Following 7 days of treatment, we challenged mice with subcutaneous injections of the MC38 colon adenocarcinoma cell line. We observed an increase in tumour volume in LFS mice treated with antibiotics; this change was not observed in p53 wildtype mice. These findings highlight potentially unique interactions between mutant p53 and the microbiome which influence tumour growth in the context of LFS. We also found that LFS mice treated with metformin have smaller tumours compared to untreated mice. A particular genus of bacteria, Faecalibaculum sp., was found to be upregulated in a cohort of metformin treated mice, and the abundance of this bacterium is inversely proportional to tumour volume. Zagato et al. have shown that Faecalibaculum rodentium has anti-tumourigenic properties through the production of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA). Altogether, these observations suggest that microbes may influence tumour growth in LFS mice. The study of interactions between the microbiome and mutant p53 and the influence of these interactions on cancer development in LFS may, with further study, provide avenues of prognostic and/or diagnostic interest. Differences in the microbiome in cancer-affected and cancer-free LFS patients may also introduce the possibility to exploit the microbiome for treatment and/or preventative purposes in these patients. Citation Format: Noel Wei Ong, Camilla Maria Giovino, Nicholas William Fischer, Pamela Psarianos, David Malkin. Investigating the interaction between the microbiome and mutant p53 in Li-Fraumeni Syndrome [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3047.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207