MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282959000 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-3853

Abstract 3853: Investigating PRL2/<i>PTP4A2</i> as a new target for glioblastoma treatment

2022· article· en· W4282959000 on OpenAlexaff
Tiffanie Chouleur, Marie‐Alix Derieppe, Wilfried Souleyreau, Michel L. Tremblay, Andréas Bikfalvi

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Tyrosine Phosphatases
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancer researchCarcinogenesisContext (archaeology)Lung cancerCancerMedicineBrain tumorGliomaTumor microenvironmentTumor progressionBreast cancerBiologyOncologyPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor. The standard treatment consists in tumor resection followed by chemo- and radio- therapy. However, tumor recurrence still remains inevitable, and the average lifespan of patients is only 15 months. Over the past decades, targeted therapies such as anti-angiogenic therapy, were proposed but failed to improve overall survival. In this context, the identification of new therapeutic targets is fundamental to implement current treatments. Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases (PTPs) are known to be involved in oncogenesis in several types of cancer, including GBM. Oncogenic properties of PRL2 has been demonstrated in different tumors (e.g. leukemia, breast, lung and nasopharyngeal cancer), but no evidence of PRL2 involvement in GBM has been reported so far. The aim of this project is to understand the role of PRL2 in GBM development, in order to evaluate the potential of PRL2 inhibition as a new therapeutic strategy. Analysis of TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) dataset revealed that PRL2 was a poor prognostic factor in gliomas, and its expression correlated GBM aggressiveness. PTP4A2 expression also correlated with expression of genes involved in immune responses, reactive oxygen species, actin cytoskeleton and trafficking. Thus, we oriented our work towards these directions. To study PRL2 effects both in brain tumor cells and microenvironment, we used spheroids of patient-derived GBM cells, in which PTP4A2 expression was modulated. In vitro assays showed that migration, invasion and adhesion abilities were increased in PTP4A2-KO cells but cell proliferation was not affected. Next, in orthotopic xenografts experiments, PRL2 over-expression promoted tumor growth and reduced mouse survival rate. In addition, to overcome PRLs functional compensation and to use a clinically relevant strategy, we targeted all PRLs (PRL1, 2 and 3) activity with an inhibitory compound. Inhibiting all PRLs drastically reduced viability of GBM cells. Our project aims at discovering how PRL2 is involved in the progression and tumor microenvironment of GBM. Our results indicate that PRL2 promotes GBM growth in response to microenvironmental pressure and its inhibition improves mouse outcomes. However, the precise mechanisms of this regulation are still under investigation. Targeting PRLs and particularly PRL2 open avenue for therapeutic strategy in GBM treatment. Citation Format: Tiffanie Chouleur, Marie-Alix Derieppe, Wilfried Souleyreau, Michel L. Tremblay, Andreas Bikfalvi. Investigating PRL2/PTP4A2 as a new target for glioblastoma treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3853.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicProtein Tyrosine PhosphatasesFrench-language works237,207