MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282959999 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-559

Abstract 559: Targeting hematological malignancies and solid tumors with switchable chimeric antigen receptor-engineered iPSC-derived natural killer cells

2022· article· en· W4282959999 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaohua Li, Benjamin Goldenson, Jaya Lakshmi Thangaraj, Matthew Gynn, Diana Gumber, Myan Do, Karl Willert, Dan S. Kaufman

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChimeric antigen receptorCancer researchCD19Induced pluripotent stem cellCD33NKG2DImmunotherapyBiologyAntigenImmunologyStem cellCell biologyCD34Cytotoxic T cellImmune systemEmbryonic stem cellGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Switchable chimeric antigen receptors (sCAR) provide an important new strategy to precisely regulate CAR-mediated anti-tumor activity. The sCAR system combines a CAR that recognizes peptide neoepitope (PNE) with an injectable “switch” molecule that consists of an anti-tumor Fab linked to PNE. Configurating PNE at different location or chain of the Fab enables us to identify best switches optimal for tumor targeting. Previous studies demonstrate that this sCAR system expressed in T cells provides tight control over anti-tumor activity. Here, we translated this approach to engineer natural killer (NK) cells with the sCAR to provide a universal, targeted cell-therapy approach in a patient-nonspecific manner. First, we engineered human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) with the sCAR combining the PNE-specific CAR scFv with our previously described NK cell optimized CAR4 signaling motifs consisting of the NKG2D transmembrane domain, 2B4 co-stimulatory domain and the CD3ζ chain. We selected clones that maintained highest level of pluripotency and most stable expression of the sCAR4 on the surface. Next, we generated mature sCAR4-expressing iPSC-derived NK cells that expressed common surface receptors similar to that of donor peripheral blood mononuclear cell-derived NK cells. We then used three panels of switches with specificity to CD19 (consisting of 9 different configurations), to CD33, CD123 and CLL1 (1 configuration each), and to FRIZZLED7 (FZD7; 6 configurations) to target CD19+ B cell lymphoma, acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and ovarian cancer, respectively. All three targets demonstrated switch-specific dose response in killing tumor cell lines. Different configurations conferred variable efficiencies in switch-mediating tumor cell killings and the optimal switch concentrations were found to be different from what was observed previously with sCAR-expressing T cells. In a comparison with the “conventional” (non-switchable) CARs (cCARs), iPSC-NK cells expressing either sCAR4 and treated with an anti-CD19 switch or iPSC-NK cells with an anti-CD19-cCAR4 demonstrated similar level of cytotoxicity against B cell leukemia cells. Finally, we have built a mouse model and are currently testing the iPSC-NK-sCAR system in vivo. Together, this iPSC-NK-sCAR strategy enables close control over CAR-mediated activity with flexibility to target multiple tumor types and a potential to become a novel off-the-shelf therapy. Citation Format: Xiao-Hua Li, Benjamin Goldenson, Jaya Lakshmi Thangaraj, Matthew Gynn, Diana Gumber, Myan Do, Karl Willert, Dan S. Kaufman. Targeting hematological malignancies and solid tumors with switchable chimeric antigen receptor-engineered iPSC-derived natural killer cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 559.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207