MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4282961792 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-5394

Abstract 5394: Uterine leiomyosarcoma with homologous recombination deficiency is highly sensitive to polo-like kinase 4 inhibitor

2022· article· en· W4282961792 on OpenAlexaff
Tsz Yan Chong, Horace HY Lee, Judy WP Yam, Kin Long Chow, Ho Shing Wong, Ka Yu Tse, Mark R. Bray, Tak W. Mak, Philip P.C. Ip

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyHomologous recombinationMolecular biologyMitotic catastropheApoptosisMitosisCell cycleCancer researchCell biologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is rare and aggressive and without a well-established cancer-driver. Treatment is mainly surgical because most other therapies have limited benefits. Polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4) is a modulator of centriole duplication that is essential for proper cell division. Its inhibition by the PLK4 inhibitor, CFI-400945 resulted in centriole dysregulation, increased in double-strand DNA damage, and ultimately, mitotic catastrophe and cell death. Recent genomic studies have identified a subset of LMS with homologous recombination (HR) repair deficiency. We hypothesize that HR-deficient LMS is highly sensitive to CFI-400945. METHODS: Gene knockouts (KO) were done by CRISPR-Cas9 system. Plasmids encoding the BRCA1- and BRCA2-targeting guide RNA, Cas9 protein, and selection markers were generated and were transfected into SK-UT-1 and SKN followed by selection with antibiotics. The KO and wild-type cell lines were treated with CFI-400945 in vitro. Percentage apoptosis was evaluated by Annexin V-PI staining and cell proliferation was examined by sulforhodamine B assay. To determine whether BRCA1- and BRCA2-KO had any effects on double-strand DNA damage, the γH2AX foci were studied by immunofluorescence staining. RESULTS: CFI-400945 caused a greater degree of apoptosis and less cell viability in the KO than in the wild-type cell lines. In SK-UT-1, quantity of apoptotic cells for BRCA2-KO and BRCA1-KO were 77% and 34%, respectively, versus 27% in the wild-type cell line (p<0.05). Less dramatic findings were observed in SKN with respective percentages of 20% and 25% versus 15% (p<0.05). In SK-UT-1, the mean IC50 for BRCA2-KO and BRCA1-KO were 3.4 nM and 5.5 nM, respectively, versus 7.8 nM in the wild-type cell line (p<0.05). Similar observations were noted in SKN, with respective mean IC50 of 6.5 nM and 7.1 nM versus 10.0 nM (p<0.05). After CFI-400945 treatment, the γH2AX/Hoechst 33342 staining intensity ratio was 0.40 in SK-UT-1 BRAC2-KO and 0.44 in BRCA1-KO, where both were higher than in the corresponding wild-type cell line with 0.29 (p<0.05). Similarly, the intensities in the two SKN KO cell lines were 0.29 and 0.31, respectively, and higher than in the wild-type cell line with 0.19 (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PLK4 inhibitor induced DNA double-strand breaks in LMS and the repair of these breakages was dependent on HR repair. In vitro, LMS with BRCA1 or BRCA2 deficiencies were more sensitive to the effect of PLK4 inhibitor. Citation Format: Tsz Yan Chong, Horace HY Lee, Judy WP Yam, Kin Long Chow, Ho Shing Wong, Ka Yu Tse, Mark R. Bray, Tak Wah Mak, Philip PC Ip. Uterine leiomyosarcoma with homologous recombination deficiency is highly sensitive to polo-like kinase 4 inhibitor [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5394.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→