An intrinsically stretchable and bendable electrochromic device
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Stretchable electrochromic devices (ECDs) were fabricated from electrospun PEDOT:PSS (poly(3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrene sulfonate) fibers. Stretchable and transparent electrodes with a sheet resistance of 1200 Ω sq −1 were prepared by depositing the conductive fibers on elastomeric substrates that were prepared from polydimethylsiloxane. The conductive substrates replaced the ITO coated glass electrodes that are typically used in ECDs. The functioning device was prepared from a flexible chitosan electrolytic gel and a 4, 7-bis(4-diphenylaminophenyl)−2, 1, 3-benzothiaziazole (TPA-BZT-TPA) electrochrome that were deposited on the streatchable transparent electrodes. The assembled device could be stretched to 150% its original length and bent to a curvature of 0.1. The device could be operated and switched between its yellow (off) and blue (on) states while being stretched and bent with a maximum contrast ΔT ≈ 30% at 805 nm and a coloration efficiency of 168 cm 2 C −1 . The stretchable device had an electrochromic contrast that was 30% greater than its counterpart that was prepared from conventional ITO-glass electrodes. The critical composition required for making devices truly stretchable was possible by evaluating the performance of five types of devices consisting of different layers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".