MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282967195 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-5048

Abstract 5048: Imaging based EGFR mutation subtype classification using EfficientNet

2022· article· en· W4282967195 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel L. Franklin, Tara Pattilachan, Anthony M. Magliocco

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMutationEpidermal growth factor receptorLymph nodeMedicineCancer researchComputer scienceBiologyCancerPathologyInternal medicineGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study aimed to determine whether EfficientNet-B0 was able to classify EGFR mutation subtypes with H&E stained whole slide images of lung and lymph node tissue. Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for the majority of all lung adenocarcinomas, with estimates that up to a third of such cases have a mutation in their epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). EGFR mutations can occur in various subtypes, such as Exon19 deletion, and L858R substitution, which are important for early therapy decisions. Here, we propose a deep learning approach for detecting and classifying EGFR mutation subtypes, which will greatly reduce the cost of determining mutation status, allowing for testing in a low resource setting. Methods: An EfficientNet-B0 model was trained with whole slide images of lung tissue or metastatic lymph nodes with known EGFR mutation subtype (wild type, exon19 deletion or L858R substitution). Regions of interest were tiled into 512x512 pixel images. The RGB .jpeg tiles are augmented by rotating 90°, 180°, 270°, and mirroring. The model was initialized with random parameters and trained with a batch size of 32, a learning rate of 0.0001 for 1 epoch before the validation loss increased for the next 5 epochs. Results: The model achieved a slide AUC of 0.8333, and a tile AUC of 0.8010. Slide AUC is the result of averaging all tiles within a slide and measuring performance based on correctly predicted slides (n=18). Tile AUC is the result of measuring performance based on correctly predicted tiles (n=102,000). Conclusion: Using EfficientNet-B0 architecture as the basis for our EGFR mutation classification system, we were able to create a top performing model and achieve a slide AUC of 0.833 and tile AUC of 0.801. Healthcare providers and researchers may utilize this AI model in clinical settings to allow for detection of EGFR mutation from routinely captured images and bypass expensive and time consuming sequencing methods. Table 1. Number of image tiles used and the number of slides they were extracted from. Train Validation Test Exon19 tiles 187,384 47,904 33,096 L858R tiles 166,288 19,512 26,136 Wild type tiles 225,944 27,696 42,768 Exon19 slides 47 6 6 L858R slides 46 6 6 WIld type slides 43 6 6 Citation Format: Daniel L. Franklin, Tara Pattilachan, Anthony Magliocco. Imaging based EGFR mutation subtype classification using EfficientNet [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5048.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.456
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207