MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282971198 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-4066

Abstract 4066: Anticancer effects of the gold complex auranofin on high-grade serous ovarian cancer cells

2022· article· en· W4282971198 on OpenAlexaff
Farah H. Abdalbari, Alicia A. Goyeneche, Elvis M. Jaramillo, Siham Sabri, Carlos M. Telleria

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRedox biology and oxidative stress
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAuranofinOvarian cancerCancer researchThioredoxin reductaseCancer cellMedicineCancerCell growthViability assayApoptosisChemotherapyCell cycleInternal medicineChemistryThioredoxinBiochemistryOxidative stress

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the 11th most common cancer-causing death in women. HGSOC is treated with platinum (Pt)-based chemotherapy, to which patients develop resistance over time, leaving them with very limited therapeutic options. Thus, new treatments are needed for these patients. In the present work, we provide evidence for the in vitro anti-HGSOC efficacy of the gold complex auranofin (AUF), a compound approved in the clinic in the 1980’s as an anti-rheumatic agent. AUF targets thioredoxin reductase 1 (TrxR1), which is overexpressed in many cancers, including ovarian cancer. Using the Kaplan-Meir plotter database we analyzed that high expression of TrxR1 predicted poor overall survival, suggesting that TrxR1 plays an important role in ovarian cancer progression. We show that AUF impairs the growth of HGSOC cells regardless of Pt sensitivity. HGSOC cells obtained from the same patient when it was clinically sensitive (PEO1) or resistant (PEO4) to Pt-based chemotherapy, were both equally sensitive to the growth inhibition induced by the gold complex in a concentration-dependent manner when using an MTT reduction assay. The toxicity of AUF against HGSOC cells was further studied exposing PEO1 cells to the compound and assessing cell number, cell viability, and cell cycle traverse. Results showed that AUF blocked cell proliferation, reduced viability, and caused accumulation of cells with hypo-diploid DNA content, suggesting a likely apoptosis-mediated cell death mechanism. We confirmed that AUF-triggered lethality was driven by apoptosis by measuring the accumulation of Annexin V positive/7-AAD negative cells via flow cytometry. We also found out that the lethality of AUF required the induction of oxidative stress because the effect was prevented by the presence of the reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenger N-acetyl-cysteine. We further show that AUF-induced ROS production is associated with the generation of DNA damage as denoted by the increase in the phosphorylation of the Ser-139 residue of the histone variant H2AX by western blotting thus signaling a genotoxic endpoint. Finally, we generated evidence that the combination of AUF and the Pt agent cisplatin (CDDP) is more potent than either drug alone in inducing lethality in PEO4 cells isolated from a patient when Pt-resistant. In summary, we provide proof-of-principle that the TrxR1 inhibitor AUF impairs the survival capacity of HGSOC cells regardless of their Pt sensitivities, triggering a program of apoptosis induced by oxidative stress that is associated with DNA damage; such toxicity is enhanced when AUF is combined with CDDP. The novelty of this work for cancer research in general and HGSOC in particular is that, as AUF is clinically approved to treat arthritis-related conditions, the compound can be rapidly repositioned as a consolidation therapy following Pt-based standard of care and/or overcome Pt resistant disease. Citation Format: Farah H. Abdalbari, Alicia A. Goyeneche, Elvis M. Jaramillo, Siham Sabri, Carlos M. Telleria. Anticancer effects of the gold complex auranofin on high-grade serous ovarian cancer cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 4066.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicRedox biology and oxidative stressFrench-language works237,207