Hypo-osmolar accelerated corneal crosslinking on resultant sub-400 μm topography-guided excimer regularized keratoconus corneas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) with topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK) corneal regularization followed by sequential hypo-osmolar riboflavin accelerated corneal crosslinking (CXL) in keratoconic (KC) eyes with <400 μm stromal bed thickness after excimer ablation. SETTING: Multisurgeon multicenter standardized protocol practice. DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter case series. METHODS: This study included progressive KC eyes that underwent PTK and T-PRK combined with accelerated CXL and had a corneal stromal bed thickness of <400 μm after excimer ablation before administration of hypo-osmolar riboflavin. Demographics and clinical measures were reviewed at baseline and every follow-up visit. RESULTS: 61 consecutive eyes had a mean corneal stromal bed thickness of 367 ± 21 μm after excimer laser normalization. Postoperatively, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) improved by 0.29 logMAR ( P < .0001), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) improved by 0.07 logMAR ( P = .0012), and maximum keratometry (Kmax) decreased by 4.67 diopters ( P < .0001). The safety index was favorable (1.29 ± 0.56), with stable manifest astigmatism, Kmax, and pachymetry at 12 months. 2 eyes (3%) showed evidence of keratometric progression on topography. CONCLUSIONS: In KC corneas thinner than 400 μm after excimer ablation, PTK epithelial removal followed by T-PRK and hypo-osmolar accelerated CXL decreases manifest astigmatism and Kmax, improves UDVA and CDVA, and halted disease progression in 97% of eyes at 12 months. These outcomes are comparable with thicker ablated corneas not requiring hypo-osmolar stromal swelling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".