MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Cohort Study [A258]

2022· article· en· W4282973367 on OpenAlexaff
Ayellet Tzur-Tseva, Nicholas Czuzoj‐Shulman, Haim A. Abenhaim

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrics and Gynecology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuraPregnancyObstetricsOdds ratioThrombotic microangiopathyPlacental abruptionPreeclampsiaRetrospective cohort studyCohortEclampsiaInternal medicinePediatricsGestationPlatelet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare microangiopathy. Little is known of its impact on pregnancy. The aim was to evaluate the association between maternal TTP and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the U.S. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project–Nationwide Inpatient Sample. A cohort of women who delivered between 1999 and 2015 was created. Then ICD-9 code 446.6 was used to identify women with a diagnosis of TTP, with the remaining women without a TTP diagnosis being the comparison group. Multivariate logistic regression estimated the effect of TTP on maternal and neonatal outcomes, while adjusting for maternal baseline variables. RESULTS: A total of 13,792,544 women delivered between 1999 and 2015, of whom 280 had a TTP diagnosis (2/100,000). Women with a TTP diagnosis, compared to those without, had more preexisting health conditions (diabetes, hypertension, and obesity). TTP was associated with several adverse outcomes: maternal death (odds ratio [OR], 215.50; 95% CI, 121.19–383.22), preeclampsia (OR, 18.63, 14.57–23.82), eclampsia (OR, 27.80; 95% CI, 13.08–59.11), placental abruption (OR, 5.20; 95% CI, 3.18–8.50), disseminated intravascular coagulation (OR, 139.11; 95% CI, 81.97–236.09), venous thromboembolism (OR, 10.69; 95% CI, 5.25–21.73), sepsis (OR, 118.42; 95% CI, 63.62–220.42), myocardial infarction (OR, 268.60; 95% CI, 84.30–855.81), postpartum hemorrhage (OR, 15.00; 95% CI, 11.66–19.29), requiring a blood transfusion (OR, 59.77; 95% CI, 46.54–76.76), and cesarean delivery (OR, 3.52; 95% CI, 2.74–4.53). Neonates born to women with a TTP diagnosis were at increased risk for preterm birth (OR, 3.40; 95% CI, 2.58–4.49), intrauterine growth restriction (OR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.68–4.41), and stillbirth (OR, 9.41; 95% CI, 5.95–14.88). CONCLUSION: TTP increases the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, including maternal and fetal death. Women with TTP in the past or present should be followed closely by a multidisciplinary team.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetrics and GynecologySame topicHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207