MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4282975806 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-2625

Abstract 2625: Personalized chemotherapy treatments for microsatellite instable tumors

2022· article· en· W4282975806 on OpenAlexaff
Adam Hoffman, Sanjima Pal, Veena Sangwan, Lorenzo Ferri

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsMontreal General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrosatellite instabilityOrganoidCancerChemotherapyMedicineCancer researchBiologyMutationOncologyBioinformaticsInternal medicineMicrosatelliteGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Esophagogastric adenocarcinomas with microsatellite instability (MSI) high status often display chemoresistance, as the current therapies are ineffective. It is hypothesized that the poor response of MSI-high esophagogastric adenocarcinomas to therapies is due to the extensive genomic mutational heterogeneity, which can be overcome by identifying, stratifying, and targeting multiple genetic alterations concurrently. The goals of this project are to: 1) Identify a matched retrospective cohort of 20 MSI-high to 20 microsatellite stable organoids, derived from biobanked tumor tissue. 2) Analyze mismatch repair protein function/loss, to confirm that the primary tumor microsatellite status is recapitulated in 3D organoid models. 3) Test standard of care chemotherapies, and explore alternative approaches to prevent chemoresistance by evaluating targeted agents based on genomic sequencing. Methods: Patient-derived organoids grow for ~14 days, after which they are enzymatically disrupted and plated in Matrigel. I will confirm that the organoid models accurately represent clinal response, by treating them with the same chemotherapy received by the patient. 10 different drug concentrations are added in triplicate using a drug dispenser, then after 72 hours, organoid viability is determined with a plate reader. Results: Genomic characterization of 13/226 MSI-high cases has been conducted with a 234 gene gastric cancer specific panel to identify and target genomic alterations. Preliminary robotic drug screens guided by these mutation profiles have been conducted, yielding promising alternative treatments. Conclusions: By targeting the particular mutations found in MSI-high patients, it could help explain the chemoresistance mechanism, so promising personalized treatment approaches for esophagogastric adenocarcinomas can be clinically implemented. Sources of Funding: This project is funded by the Inez and Willena Beaton Award in Oncology, valued at $7,500 and provided by the RI-MUHC. The operating grants that support the research are $120,000 over 2 years from the Cancer Research Society, and $1,200,000 USD over 3 years given by the Department of Defense. Citation Format: Adam Hoffman, Sanjima Pal, Veena Sangwan, Lorenzo Ferri. Personalized chemotherapy treatments for microsatellite instable tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 2625.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer→French-language works237,207→