Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No AccessUrology PracticeBusiness1 Jul 2022Reply by Authorsis a reply to letterEditorial CommentaryEditorial CommentaryEditorial Commentary Michael Uy, Braden Millan, Conor Jones, David Sands, Edward Matsumoto, Benjamin Bay, and Bobby Shayegan Michael UyMichael Uy https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9426-7360 Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author , Braden MillanBraden Millan Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author , Conor JonesConor Jones Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author , David SandsDavid Sands Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author , Edward MatsumotoEdward Matsumoto Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Department of Urology, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author , Benjamin BayBenjamin Bay Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Department of Urology, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author , and Bobby ShayeganBobby Shayegan *Correspondence: Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Ave. E, G343 Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N4A6 telephone: 905-522-1155, ext. 33982; FAX: 905-308-7210; email address: E-mail Address: [email protected] Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Department of Urology, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000305.04AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Reply by Authors." Urology Practice, 9(4), pp. 304–305 Reference 1. : Robotic surgery in urological oncology: patient care or market share?Nat Rev Urol 2015; 12: 55. Google Scholar © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRelated articlesUrology PracticeMay 12, 2022, 12:00:00 AMEditorial CommentaryUrology PracticeMay 12, 2022, 12:00:00 AMEditorial CommentaryUrology PracticeMay 12, 2022, 12:00:00 AMEditorial Commentary Volume 9Issue 4July 2022Page: 304-305 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Michael Uy Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author Braden Millan Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author Conor Jones Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author David Sands Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author Edward Matsumoto Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Department of Urology, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author Benjamin Bay Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Department of Urology, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author Bobby Shayegan Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Department of Urology, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada *Correspondence: Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Ave. E, G343 Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N4A6 telephone: 905-522-1155, ext. 33982; FAX: 905-308-7210; email address: E-mail Address: [email protected] More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it