MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283070634 · doi:10.1016/j.cjcpc.2022.05.005

How Small Is Too Small? The Challenge of Accurate Prenatal and Postnatal Detection of Coarctation of the Aorta

2022· editorial· en· W4283070634 on OpenAlexaff
Yalin Lin, Varsha Thakur

Bibliographic record

VenueCJC Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease · 2022
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai HospitalHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCoarctation of the aortaPrenatal diagnosisDuctus arteriosusCardiologyPerioperativeCardiogenic shockGreat arteriesInternal medicineFetal echocardiographyDescending aortaHypoplastic left heart syndromeAortaHeart diseaseFetusPediatricsPregnancySurgeryMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With improved imaging in foetal echocardiography, many types of congenital heart diseases can be detected prenatally allowing for care coordination and improved outcomes.1–3 Despite this significant improvement, prenatal diagnosis and postnatal confirmation of coarctation of the aorta remain challenging. Coarctation of the aorta is defined as a narrowing of the descending aorta, typically in the isthmus region where the ductus arteriosus inserts. Identifying coarctation of the aorta is critical as a missed diagnosis can lead to cardiac dysfunction, cardiogenic shock, adverse outcomes, and mortality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.137
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.137
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.006
Scholarly communication0.0060.017
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0050.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCJC Pediatric and Congenital Heart DiseaseSame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207