AFM/XPS Analysis of the Growth and Architecture of Oriented Molecular Monolayer by Spin Cast Process and Its Cross-Linking Induced by Hyperthermal Hydrogen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We used atomic force microscopy (AFM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to comprehensively study the growth and the cross-linking of dotriacontane (C32H66) nanofilms that were deposited on a silicon wafer by the spin-coating process. It was found that the molecular structure of the nanofilms changed with C32H66 concentration at the given spin speed, of which a monolayer of oriented C32H66 molecules, formed at lower deposition concentrations, was composed of a perpendicular orientation state with the molecular long-chain axis perpendicular to the substrate surface and a parallel orientation state, while the perpendicular state was essentially dominant when the nanofilm was formed at higher deposition concentrations. The shortening of the first perpendicular layer in AFM topography could be attributed to the mixing of both parallel and perpendicular lamellas in the first layer. XPS analysis indicated that the average thickness of the layer almost linearly increased with the C32H66 concentration. The monolayer of C32H66 film could be cross-linked by a hyperthermal hydrogen-induced cross-linking (HHIC) at a few eV via kinetic collision to cleave C-H bonds. The water contact angle measurement of extensive HHIC on C32H66 nanofilms disclosed that the static contact angle decreased with the treatment time (or fluence) and saturated after full cross-linking of the film.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".