Influence of salinity acclimatization on energy, oxygen consumption rate and glucose levels for Carassius auratus (Goldfish)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the influence of increasing salinity concentrations on some indicators of energy consumption such as dissolved oxygen consumption, the consumed energy, as well as the levels of blood glucose in Carassius auratus (Goldfish), because of their direct relation with the metabolism rates when fish are exposed to exertion. Fish with an average weight of 37.5+2.5 g were exposed to four salinity concentrations 0.1, 3, 6, and 9 grams per 1 liter; concentration represented four treatments, and the first one is control. Results showed that there was increase in the rate of oxygen consumption to 92.34, 126.24, and 158.86 mg O2/kg/hour in the salinity concentration levels 3, 6, and 9 respectively, compared to the control (88.16 mg O2/kg/hour). This increase in oxygen consumption affected the consumption rate of energy, which achieved 0.311, 0.425, and 0.535 kilo calories in the salinity concentrations of 3, 6, and 9 gram/L liter, respectively, compared to the control (0.297 kilo calories/kg/hour). Concerning blood glucose levels rose in the salinity concentrations of 3, 6, and 9 gram/L liter to 68.33, 87.88, and 108.69 mg/100mL, respectively, compared to the control (66.33 mg/100 mL).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".