In-house low-cost water table prototype to practically analyse the modelling compressible flow in a fluid engineering course
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present work studies the hydro-gasdynamic analogy between a shock wave, occurring in supersonic internal or external compressible flows, and a hydraulic jump, a sort of normal shock occurring in open-channel flows. It consists of an extensive theoretical framework followed by a practical analysis, the aim of which was to experimentally trigger the hydraulic jump, both normal and oblique, while using a low-cost designed lab prototype. The assembly development, called ‘water table’, arises from the necessity of economical alternatives to expensive supersonic wind tunnels in the experimental study of compressible fluid dynamics. With this objective in mind, a hydraulic canal based on a Laval nozzle was constructed where water flow could accelerate from subcritical to critical to supercritical regime and then return to subcritical regime through a hydraulic jump. In addition, multiple design alternatives were evaluated considering environmental, economic, functional and aesthetics factors. A low-cost implementation was the critical criterion in the design process. The measurements have revealed that the geometry of the nozzle and the wedges designed as obstacles to cause obliquity are the most significant and influential elements in the formation of a hydraulic jump in the experimental set-up. Regarding the experimental variables, the experiments demonstrate the effect of the upstream and downstream heights of the hydraulic jump in the data collection. This experience is a step forward in supporting students in the understanding of compressible flow and its principles by providing an in-house experimental set-up that promotes active learning, motivation and interest in fluid mechanics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".