MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283164803 · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2022-bsg.183

P127 Optical diagnosis training to improve dysplasia characterisation in inflammatory bowel disease (OPTIC-IBD): a multicentre RCT

2022· article· en· W4283164803 on OpenAlex
M Iacucci, RJM Ingram, A Bazarova, R Cannatelli, N Labarile, O Nardone, T Parigi, K Siau, S Smith, S Ghosh

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDysplasiaInflammatory bowel diseaseRandomized controlled trialColonoscopyClinical endpointPhysical therapyInternal medicineDiseaseColorectal cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Introduction</h3> Endoscopic surveillance is performed in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to detect dysplasia. However, chronic inflammation alters mucosal and vascular colonic architecture, complicating lesion recognition. Optical diagnosis enhances our ability to accurately characterise IBD-associated dysplasia but such training is not readily available. We aim to fill this gap by developing and validating the new OPTIC-IBD online training platform (NCT04924543, funding GutsUK TRN2019-03). <h3>Methods</h3> We designed an interactive, self-directed, multi-modality learning module. This includes surveillance principles, optical diagnosis methods, characterisation approach, classifications (SCENIC, Kudo, FACILE), examples and self-assessments. We invited participants from Canada, Italy and UK, including novice (&lt;100 lifetime colonoscopies), intermediate and experienced endoscopists (≥1000). Assessments comprised 24 short endoscopic videos of IBD colonic lesions, divided into 8 non-dysplastic and 16 dysplastic lesions. Participants classified lesions, predicted histology and rated their confidence. All participants completed online training and feedback. Videos were repeated in a random order after ≥7 days. Participants were then randomised 1:1 to get feedback and extra training. All had a final assessment at 60 days with prior/new videos and similar case mix. We report diagnostic performance for dysplasia, interrater reliability and rater confidence. <h3>Results</h3> We present a planned interim analysis of 77 participants after pre- and post-course assessments (table 1). Diagnostic accuracy improved (primary endpoint: 44.5 to 54.0%, <i>P</i>&lt;0.0001), particularly for novice and intermediate endoscopists. Sensitivity for dysplasia increased (50.3 to 59.1%) in line with prior experience. Specificity and accuracy were most improved for high confidence diagnoses (44.9 to 70.3% and 55.0 to 64.6%). In multilevel logistic regression, training was associated with correct diagnoses for high confidence (OR 1.40, 1.13–1.77) but not low confidence ratings (OR 1.09, 0.96–1.25). Training improved precision between participants and their confidence. <h3>Conclusions</h3> The OPTIC-IBD training module improved participants’ accuracy, precision and confidence in the optical diagnosis of IBD-associated dysplasia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it