MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283211147 · doi:10.3389/ftox.2022.941665

Editorial: Role of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor in Immune Modulation

2022· editorial· en· W4283211147 on OpenAlexaff
Barbara L.F. Kaplan, Carolyn J. Baglole, Courtney E. W. Sulentic

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Toxicology · 2022
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotoxicology and immune responses
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAryl hydrocarbon receptorImmunotoxicologyImmune systemArylImmune modulationChemistryImmunologyMedicineBiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), originally discovered as a xenobiotic receptor involved in upregulating metabolic enzymes, has become increasingly linked to physiological processes (McMillan and Bradfield, 2007;Okey, 2007;Abel and Haarmann-Stemmann, 2010;Wang et al., 2017;Roman et al., 2018;Rothhammer and Quintana, 2019).The discovery of endogenous, dietary and bacterial-derived ligands for the AhR further supports its involvement in the homeostatic regulation of biological processes (Adachi et al., 2001;Denison et al., 2011;Bessede et al., 2014;Faber et al., 2018;Rannug and Rannug, 2018;Doan et al., 2020).Yet, dysregulation of many of these processes can lead to disease states involving the immune system.Indeed, a toxicological and/or physiological role for the AhR in almost every facet of the immune system has emerged over the past 2 decades.Now, in addition to the AhR being an environmental sensor and mediator of toxicity, this enigmatic protein has emerged as a potential therapeutic target (Murray et al., 2010;Merches et al., 2017;Marafini et al., 2019;Safe et al., 2020;Esser, 2021;Lebwohl et al., 2021).However, many questions remain regarding the interplay between the toxicological and physiological functions of the AhR as well as the molecular mechanisms by which the AhR mediates its pleiotropic effects on immunity.In this special issue, three original research papers explored the role of the AhR in celland organ-specific immune responses.Further, two review papers described the role of the AhR as an environmental sensor in the eye as well as the skin and gut.Over the past decade, the AhR has emerged as a physiological regulator of specific T-cell and innate lymphoid cell (ILC) subtypes (Kiss et al., 2011;Lee et al., 2011;Qiu et al., 2012;Gutiérrez-Vázquez and Quintana, 2018).Until recently, there was negligible information on the AhR in different human B-cell subpopulations.Blevins et al., using human peripheral blood B cells, examined the role of the AhR in a specific B cell subtype, called CD5 + "innate-like" B cells (ILB).Although human CD5 + B cells are still poorly understood and appear to differ markedly from mouse CD5 + B cells, the authors discovered a significant correlation between the percent of CD5 + B cells and inhibition of IgM secretion by the high affinity AhR ligand TCDD.Furthermore CD5 - conventional B cells were resistant to the inhibitory effect of TCDD.When considering that CD5 + B cells appear to play an important protective role against bacterial pathogens, especially in children and the elderly, these results support a potential impairment in this protection upon exposure to environmental AhR ligands.While the previous publication highlighted a novel role for the AhR in a B cell subtype that bridges adaptive and innate immunity, the publication by Ishihara et al. reinforces the importance of the AhR in innate immunity, and in particular macrophage production of IL-22.The function of IL-22 may be pro-or anti-inflammatory, the nature of which may be context, organ and/or disease-specific.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0120.020
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in ToxicologySame topicImmunotoxicology and immune responsesFrench-language works237,207