Sex-specific reproductive strategies in wild yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventer): senescence and genetic variance in annual reproductive success differ between the sexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Owing to sex-specific reproductive strategies, the mean and variance in annual offspring production may differ between the sexes. In addition, there may be sex-specific changes in reproductive performance with age (e.g. senescence). We used 20 and 50 years of longitudinal data on male and female yellow-bellied marmots, respectively, to investigate sex-specific age effects and genetic variance in annual reproductive success. In both sexes, annual offspring production increased linearly with age until a peak was reached at 7 years. This was followed by a decline in annual offspring production in both sexes, indicative of reproductive senescence. However, the initial increase and the subsequent decline (senescence) in reproductive success were both faster in males compared to females. Genetic variance in annual offspring production was higher in males than in females, but heritability was low for both sexes. Additionally, we found no cross-sex genetic correlation in the number of offspring produced, possibly reflecting sex-specific selection related to the inter-sexual differences in reproductive strategies. There was an effect of year on annual offspring production in both sexes, with a high yearly correlation between the sexes emphasizing the importance of environmental variation in determining fitness. Overall, these results demonstrate the impact of sex-specific reproductive strategies on annual offspring production and suggest that male and female marmots may be evolving to separate phenotypic optima. This study further demonstrates the value and limitations of long-term studies investigating sex-based patterns of ageing in the wild. Significance This study on yellow-bellied marmots demonstrates the key constraints surrounding the research of age-related changes in reproduction in wild populations, which is especially challenging in males. Among these challenges are high immigration rates which prevent the estimation of exact age and maternal identity. Genetic analysis—the only reliable way to estimate paternity—has only been a recent development, limiting the number of father-son relationships available for analysis. The dataset used in this study is long term (20 years of data on males and 50 on females), partially overcoming these obstacles. Results show that reproductive success declines with age in both sexes, with a faster rate of decline in males compared to females, and is influenced by the environment. Genetically, male and female reproductive success is not correlated, revealing that both sexes may be following separate evolutionary trajectories.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".