Care Pattern for Fontan‐Associated Liver Disease by Academic Pediatric Hepatologists in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fontan-Associated Liver Disease (FALD) is a common extracardiac complication seen in patients following the Fontan procedure. There are no consensus guidelines on screening and management of children with FALD. Objective: The current study aims to determine academic pediatric hepatologists' practices and identify variability in management provided to children with FALD in Canada. Methods: Using the infrastructure of the Canadian Pediatric Hepatology Research Group, a nationwide survey was distributed electronically to all pediatric hepatologists practicing in university-affiliated hospitals. Results: Twelve pediatric hepatologists from 12 of 13 academic centers (92%) responded to the survey. The institutions of only 2 (17%) physicians offer post-Fontan care with a multidisciplinary team, both from different provinces. The screening for other comorbidities, use of noninvasive modality, and timing of liver biopsy for estimation of liver fibrosis and screening for esophageal varices differ from program to program. The frequency of outpatient clinic follow-up varies significantly. Education and counseling concerning liver health are generally used as treatment; only 58% of academic centers have a formal adult care transition plan. Conclusions: Significant discrepancies exist in the care provided to children with FALD by hepatologists practicing in academic centers across Canada. Future study is needed to develop a standardized protocol for managing and following children and youth with FALD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".