The prediction of early mortality by the ROX index of oxygenation and respiratory rate in diverse Canadian and Ugandan cohorts of unselected patient: a post-hoc retrospective analysis of 80,558 patient observations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the association between in-hospital mortality and the ROX index of respiratory rate and oxygenation in diverse cohorts of unselected patient at different prediction windows. METHODS: A retrospective post-hoc analysis of data from a major regional referral Canadian hospital and a low-resource hospital in sub-Saharan Africa. RESULTS: Four patient cohorts were examined: Canadian medical, surgical and intensive care unit (ICU) patients, and all patients admitted to an African hospital. In all patients in-hospital mortality rose as ROX declined. Apart from ICU patients, ROX had a high discrimination for death within 72 hours. For non-ICU patients the negative predictive value of death within 72 hours for a ROX value <22 ranged from 0.994 to 1.000 Conclusion: In diverse cohorts of unselected patients, the ROX index has a high discrimination for death within 72 hours. However, the index has little or no prognostic value for patient admitted to ICU.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".