MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283259739 · doi:10.1002/chem.202200637

A High‐Nuclear Isopolymolybdate Cluster Assembled with an Anionic [{Mo<sub>24</sub>O<sub>48</sub>(OMe)<sub>32</sub>}]<sup>8−</sup> and Two Charge‐Neutral [{Mo<sub>24</sub>O<sub>52</sub>(OMe)<sub>28</sub>}] Cages

2022· article· en· W4283259739 on OpenAlex
Yingyue Wang, Xinyi Ma, Guoao Li, Huafeng Li, Quanzhong Wang, Wenjing Chen, Pengtao Ma, Shuhua Li, Jingyang Niu, Jingping Wang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry - A European Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolyoxometalates: Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCluster (spacecraft)Charge (physics)Charge exchangeAtomic physicsPhysicsChemistryCrystallographyIonComputer scienceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it