Effect of intervention delivered by frontline maternal care providers to improve outcome and parenting skills among adolescents with perinatal depression in Nigeria (the RAPiD study): A cluster randomized controlled trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Perinatal depression is more common and is associated with greater negative consequences among adolescents than adults. Psychosocial interventions designed for adults may be inadequate at addressing the unique features of adolescent perinatal depression. METHODS: In a two-arm parallel cluster randomized trial conducted in thirty primary maternal care clinics in Ibadan, Nigeria (15-intervention and 15-control) we compared age-appropriate intervention consisting of problem-solving therapy, behavioral activation, parenting skills training, and parenting support from a self-identified adult to care as usual. Pregnant adolescents (aged <20 years) at fetal gestational age16-36 weeks with moderate to severe depression were recruited. Primary outcomes were depression symptoms (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, EPDS) and parenting practices (Infant-Toddler version of the Home Inventory for Measurement of the Environment, HOME-IT) at six-months postnatal. RESULTS: There were 242 participants (intervention arm: 141; Control arm: 101), with a mean age of 18∙0 (SD-1∙2). Baseline mean EPDS score was 14∙2 (SD-2.1); 80∙1 % completed the six-month postnatal follow-up. The intervention group had lower level of depressive symptoms than the control group, mean EPDS scores: 5∙5 (SD-3∙6) versus 7∙2 (SD-4∙0) (adjusted mean difference -1∙84 (95%CI- 3∙06 to -0∙62; p = 0∙003) and better parenting practices, mean total HOME-IT scores: 29∙8 (SD-4∙4) versus 26∙4 (SD-4∙2) (adjusted mean difference 3∙4 (95%Cl- 2∙12 to 4∙69, p = 0∙001). LIMITATIONS: This study explored the effect of complex interventions making it difficult to know precisely what aspects produced the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: An age-appropriate psychosocial intervention package holds promise for scaling up care for adolescents with perinatal depression especially in resource-constrained settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN16775958. Registered on 30 April 2019.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".