MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283269386 · doi:10.1111/mec.16574

Genomics of Serrasalmidae teleosts through the lens of microbiome fingerprinting

2022· article· en· W4283269386 on OpenAlexafffund
François‐Étienne Sylvain, Éric Normandeau, Aleicia Holland, Adalberto Luís Val, Nicolas Derôme

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Ecology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyMicrobiomeIntraspecific competitionInterspecific competitionHost (biology)GenotypeEvolutionary biologySympatric speciationZoologyEcologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Associations between host genotype and host‐associated microbiomes have been shown in a variety of animal clades, but studies on teleosts mostly show weak associations. Our study aimed to explore these relationships in four sympatric Serrasalmidae (i.e., piranha) teleosts from an Amazonian lake, using data sets from the hosts genomes (single nucleotide polymorphisms from genotyping by sequencing), skin and gut microbiomes (16S rRNA gene metataxonomics) and diets (COI metabarcoding) from the same fish individuals. First, we investigated whether there were significant covariations of microbiome and fish genotypes at the inter‐ and intraspecific levels. We also assessed the extent of covariation between Serrasalmidae diet and microbiome, to isolate genotypic from dietary effects on community structure. We observed a significant covariation of skin microbiomes and host genotypes at interspecific (R2 = 24.4%) and intraspecific (R2 = 6.2%) levels, whereas gut microbiomes correlated poorly with host genotypes. Serrasalmidae diet composition was significantly correlated to fish genotype only at the interspecific level (R2 = 5.4%), but did not covary with gut microbiome composition (Mantel R = −.04). Second, we investigated whether the study of interspecific differentiation could benefit from considering host‐associated microbial communities in addition to host genotypes. By using a nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination‐based approach, we observed that ordinations from skin‐ and gut species‐specific bacterial biomarkers identified through a random forest algorithm could significantly increase the average interspecific differentiation detected through host genotype data alone. Although future studies encompassing additional species and environments are needed, our results suggest Serrasalmidae microbiomes could constitute an insightful trait to be considered when studying the interspecific differences between members of this clade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular EcologySame topicEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity StudiesFrench-language works237,207