MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283270611 · doi:10.1155/2022/1181030

K-Means Clustering Algorithm–Based Functional Magnetic Resonance for Evaluation of Regular Hemodialysis on Brain Function of Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease

2022· article· en· W4283270611 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yan Cheng, Yan Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueComputational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgorithmHemodialysisMagnetic resonance imagingDialysisMontreal Cognitive AssessmentEnd stage renal diseaseCluster analysisStage (stratigraphy)MedicineMathematicsInternal medicineDiseaseCognitive impairmentRadiologyStatisticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research was to evaluate the effects of regular hemodialysis (HD) on the brain function of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) based on improved k-means clustering algorithm (k-means) was proposed to scan the brains of 30 regular dialysis patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (experimental group) and 30 normal volunteers (control group). The proposed algorithm was compared with the traditional k-means algorithm and mean shift algorithm and applied to the magnetic resonance scan of patients with ESRD on long-term regular HD. The results showed that the neuropsychological cognitive function (NSCF) evaluation result of the test group was much better than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically obvious ( <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"> <a:mi>P</a:mi> <a:mo>&lt;</a:mo> <a:mn>0.05</a:mn> </a:math> ). The results of blood biochemistry, Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) in the test group showed no statistical difference compared with those in the control group. The running time of the improved k-means algorithm was dramatically shorter than that of traditional k-means algorithm, showing statistical difference ( <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2"> <c:mi>P</c:mi> <c:mo>&lt;</c:mo> <c:mn>0.05</c:mn> </c:math> ). Comparison among the improved and traditional k-means algorithm and mean shift algorithm suggested that the improved k-means algorithm showed a lower error rate for image segmentation, and the differences were statistically remarkable ( <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3"> <e:mi>P</e:mi> <e:mo>&lt;</e:mo> <e:mn>0.05</e:mn> </e:math> ). In conclusion, the improved k-means algorithm showed better time efficiency and the lowest error rate in processing rs-fMRI images than the traditional k-means algorithm and mean shift algorithm, and the effects of regular HD on the brains of patients with ESRD were evaluated effectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.427
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputational and Mathematical Methods in MedicineSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207