Contribution of the carotid body to thermally mediated hyperventilation in humans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Humans hyperventilate under heat and cold strain. This hyperventilatory response has detrimental consequences including acid-base dysregulation, dyspnoea, decreased cerebral blood flow and accelerated brain heating. The ventilatory response to hypoxia is exaggerated under whole-body heating and cooling, indicating that altered carotid body function might contribute to thermally mediated hyperventilation. To address whether the carotid body might contribute to heat- and cold-induced hyperventilation, we indirectly measured carotid body tonic activity via hyperoxia, and carotid body sensitivity via hypoxia, under graded heat and cold strain in 13 healthy participants in a repeated-measures design. We hypothesised that carotid body tonic activity and sensitivity would be elevated in a dose-dependent manner under graded heat and cold strain, thereby supporting its role in driving thermally mediated hyperventilation. Carotid body tonic activity was increased in a dose-dependent manner with heating, reaching 175% above baseline (P < 0.0005), and carotid body suppression with hyperoxia removed all of the heat-induced increase in ventilation (P = 0.9297). Core cooling increased carotid body activity by up to 250% (P < 0.0001), but maximal values were reached with mild cooling and thereafter plateaued. Carotid body sensitivity to hypoxia was profoundly increased by up to 180% with heat stress (P = 0.0097), whereas cooling had no detectable effect on hypoxic sensitivity. In summary, cold stress increased carotid body tonic activity and this effect was saturated with mild cooling, whereas heating had clear dose-dependent effects on carotid body tonic activity and sensitivity. These dose-dependent effects with heat strain indicate that the carotid body probably plays a primary role in driving heat-induced hyperventilation. KEY POINTS: Humans over-breathe (hyperventilate) when under heat and cold stress, and though this has detrimental physiological repercussions, the mechanisms underlying this response are unknown. The carotid body, a small organ that is responsible for driving hyperventilation in hypoxia, was assessed under incremental heat and cold strain. The carotid body drive to breathe, as indirectly assessed by transient hyperoxia, increased in a dose-dependent manner with heating, reaching 175% above baseline; cold stress similarly increased the carotid body drive to breathe, but did not show dose-dependency. Carotid body sensitivity, as indirectly assessed by hypoxic ventilatory responses, was profoundly increased by 70-180% with mild and severe heat strain, whereas cooling had no detectable effect. Carotid body hyperactivity and hypersensitivity are two interrelated mechanisms that probably underlie the increased drive to breathe with heat strain, whereas carotid body hyperactivity during mild cooling may play a subsidiary role in cold-induced hyperventilation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".