Co‐evolutionary adaptations of <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> and a clinical carbapenemase‐encoding plasmid during carbapenem exposure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract OXA‐23 is the predominant carbapenemase in carbapenem‐resistant Acinetobacter baumannii . The co‐evolutionary dynamics of A. baumannii and OXA‐23‐encoding plasmids are poorly understood. Here, we transformed A. baumannii ATCC 17978 with pAZJ221, a bla OXA−23 ‐containing plasmid from clinical A. baumannii isolate A221, and subjected the transformant to experimental evolution in the presence of a sub‐inhibitory concentration of imipenem for nearly 400 generations. We used population sequencing to track genetic changes at six time points and evaluated phenotypic changes. Increased fitness of evolving populations, temporary duplication of bla OXA−23 in pAZJ221, interfering allele dynamics, and chromosomal locus‐level parallelism were observed. To characterize genotype‐to‐phenotype associations, we focused on six mutations in parallel targets predicted to affect small RNAs and a cyclic dimeric (3′ → 5′) GMP‐metabolizing protein. Six isogenic mutants with or without pAZJ221 were engineered to test for the effects of these mutations on fitness costs and plasmid kinetics, and the evolved plasmid containing two copies of bla OXA−23 was transferred to ancestral ATCC 17978. Five of the six mutations contributed to improved fitness in the presence of pAZJ221 under imipenem pressure, and all but one of them impaired plasmid conjugation ability. The duplication of bla OXA−23 increased host fitness under carbapenem pressure but imposed a burden on the host in antibiotic‐free media relative to the ancestral pAZJ221. Overall, our study provides a framework for the co‐evolution of A. baumannii and a clinical bla OXA−23 ‐containing plasmid in the presence of imipenem, involving early bla OXA−23 duplication followed by chromosomal adaptations that improved the fitness of plasmid‐carrying cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".