A pilot study on oral cyclosporine A in association with fulguration for the treatment of interstitial cystitis with Hunner's lesions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lesion fulguration in combination with cyclosporine A (CyA) as a maintenance therapy in patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) with Hunner's lesion (HL). METHODS: Retrospective observational study of refractory patients with HL treated with daily 1.5 mg/kg or less of oral CyA following lesion fulguration. Pain severity, subjective improvement, urinary symptoms, and adverse events were used to assess long-term treatment efficiency and safety. RESULTS: Among the 22 patients, median follow-up under CyA was 27 months. Patients reported sustained significant reduction compared to pretreatment in pain (0/10 vs. 8/10; p < 0.001), urinary frequency per 24 h (9.5 vs. 20.8; p < 0.001), and nocturia (2.3 vs. 7.6; p < 0.001). Subjective improvement rate (SIR) and patient global impression of improvement were of 90% and 1 ("very much better"), respectively, including four patients who considered themselves cured (SIR: 100%). Three patients needed an additional procedure due to pain relapse. Minor increase in creatinine was observed and three patients developed or worsened their arterial hypertension. CyA dosage was decreased to 1.2 mg/kg or less for long-term relief (n = 8), creatinine increase (n = 5), and neutropenia (n = 1) with subsequent improvement in renal function without symptom deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: Oral CyA seems to allow a sustained long-term relief following HL fulguration by alleviating pain, decreasing urinary symptoms, and procuring great subjective improvement. The daily low dose of 1.5 mg/kg or less appears to have limited adverse events while preventing repeated procedures. Larger trials are warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".