MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P793: SCREENING OF NATURALLY OCCURRING CXCR4 VARIANTS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF NOVEL PATHOGENIC MUTATIONS FOR WHIM SYNDROME

2022· article· en· W4283326710 on OpenAlexaff
S. Pawar, I. Wiest, S. Maier-Munsa, B. Maierhofer, Neal Sondheimer, A. G. Taveras, A. Badarau, K. Zmajkovicova

Bibliographic record

VenueHemaSphere · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChemokine receptors and signaling
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyCXCR4GeneticsPrimary immunodeficiencyPopulationChemokine receptorPhenotypeChemokineImmunologyGeneImmune systemMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: WHIM (Warts, Hypogammaglobulinemia, Infections, Myelokathexis) syndrome is a rare, autosomal-dominant primary immunodeficiency marked by neutropenia and lymphopenia. Classically, WHIM syndrome pathogenesis is causally linked to a variety of heterozygous gain-of-function mutations in the C-terminus of chemokine receptor CXCR4, a master regulator of immune cell trafficking and homeostasis. As of February 2022, 18 variants in CXCR4 have been implicated in WHIM syndrome, while a substantial number remain unexplored for their association with the disease. Using in vitro functional assays, we previously found that impaired receptor internalization and enhanced chemotaxis are conserved in all CXCR4WHIM variants and that defective internalization correlates with neutropenia, the most penetrant phenotype of patients with WHIM syndrome. We used this approach to confirm functional defects in primary cells isolated from patients harboring a novel variant, suggesting that the in vitro profiling approach can potentially drive identification of pathogenic variants. Aims: We aimed to functionally characterize multiple previously uncharacterized variants of CXCR4 using in vitro assays. We also examined allele frequencies of these novel variants to estimate the potential number of individuals harboring these variants with a long-term goal of determining the actual prevalence of WHIM syndrome. Methods: The CXCR4-negative K562 cell line was used as a model system to express 53 novel CXCR4 variants identified in patient and population databases (ClinVar, Ensembl, CentoMD, GnomAD) and genetic screening initiatives (Invitae PATH4WARD) found in the C-terminus (hotspot of CXCR4WHIM mutations) as well as throughout the protein. The effects of these mutations on CXCR4 internalization and chemotaxis were studied in cells stimulated with the C-X-C chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12). The in vitro functional parameters were compared with known pathogenic CXCR4 variants and were used to assign a cumulative score (impaired internalization + enhanced chemotaxis) of functional defect severity. Results: Out of 53 selected variants, 42 were missense (ms), 6 were frameshift (fs), 3 were nonsense (ns), and 2 were transcript variants (tv). Eighteen of the screened variants led to a decreased internalization of CXCR4 in comparison to the wild-type (WT) receptor upon stimulation with CXCL12 while 20 variants demonstrated enhanced chemotaxis of cells toward CXCL12. Overall, 34 variants showed defects in at least one CXCR4-dependent marker. Correlation analysis and scoring of the functional parameters in cells expressing mutated or CXCR4WT revealed 17 variants (9 ms, 5 fs, 2 ns, 1 tv) that co-segregated with the known pathogenic WHIM variants. Finally, white blood cell counts in 3 patients harboring novel variants showed that CXCR4 internalization defects in vitro correlated with the severity of neutropenia. Summary/Conclusion: This is the first study characterizing functional impairments in naturally occurring CXCR4 variants via a pipeline of assays intended to predict pathogenicity. Seventeen CXCR4 variants were identified (several outside the C-terminus of CXCR4) that caused in vitro functional defects resembling those exhibited by known WHIM variants. Many (10/17) of these newly identified variants are present at high frequencies (4.4 × 10-4–8.0 × 10-6) in genomic databases. Potential association of these variants with WHIM syndrome is under investigation and is likely to expand current estimates of WHIM syndrome prevalence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.420
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemaSphereSame topicChemokine receptors and signalingFrench-language works237,207