Instant tissue field and magnetic susceptibility mapping from MRI raw phase using Laplacian enhanced deep neural networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is an MRI post-processing technique that produces spatially resolved magnetic susceptibility maps from phase data. However, the traditional QSM reconstruction pipeline involves multiple non-trivial steps, including phase unwrapping, background field removal, and dipole inversion. These intermediate steps not only increase the reconstruction time but accumulates errors. This study aims to overcome existing limitations by developing a Laplacian-of-Trigonometric-functions (LoT) enhanced deep neural network for near-instant quantitative field and susceptibility mapping (i.e., iQFM and iQSM) from raw MRI phase data. The proposed iQFM and iQSM methods were compared with established reconstruction pipelines on simulated and in vivo datasets. In addition, experiments on patients with intracranial hemorrhage and multiple sclerosis were also performed to test the generalization of the proposed neural networks. The proposed iQFM and iQSM methods in healthy subjects yielded comparable results to those involving the intermediate steps while dramatically improving reconstruction accuracies on intracranial hemorrhages with large susceptibilities. High susceptibility contrast between multiple sclerosis lesions and healthy tissue was also achieved using the proposed methods. Comparative studies indicated that the most significant contributor to iQFM and iQSM over conventional multi-step methods was the elimination of traditional Laplacian unwrapping. The reconstruction time on the order of minutes for traditional approaches was shortened to around 0.1 s using the trained iQFM and iQSM neural networks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".