The Existence Of The Quarter Life Crisis Phenomenon and Its Effect On Student Self Confidence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui tingkat quarter life crisis, tingkat kepercayaan diri mahasiswa UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta dan apakah terdapat pengaruh quarter life crisis terhadap kepercayaan diri. Objek dalam penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta yang berusia 20 sampai 25 tahun. Jumlah responden pada penelitian ini adalah 40 responded. Data dan penelitian ini dikumpulkan dengan teknik metode kuesioner, selanjutnya data dianalisis menggunakan teknik kualitatif dengan menggunakan analisis fenomenologi. Setelah data dianalisis dapat disimpulkan bahwa tingkat quarter life crisis pada mahasiswa UIN Jakarta menunjukkan kategori sedang, sedangkan tingkat kepercayaan diri pada mahasiswa UIN Jakarta menunjukkan kategori sedang. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa quarter life crisis ini merupakan perubahan emosional yang terjadi pada masa perkembangan dari remaja menuju dewasa yang menimbulkan perasaan cemas dan khawatir yang berlebihan terhadap kehidupan yang akan datang.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".