MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283361373 · doi:10.2514/6.2022-3697

Implementation of a Non-Intrusive Ultrasound Ice Accretion Sensor to an ALF502R-5 Vane Segment Ice Crystal Component Test

2022· article· en· W4283361373 on OpenAlexaffabout
Dan Fuleki, Zhigang Sun, Jason Wu, Alex Lothrop, Adam Gee

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA AVIATION 2022 Forum · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIcing and De-icing Technologies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccretion (finance)IcingGeologySupercoolingCascadeEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceRemote sensingAstrophysicsMeteorologyPhysicsEngineeringOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

View Video Presentation: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2022-3697.vid Ultrasound ice accretion sensors (UIAS’s) were successfully utilized on an ALF502R-5 vane segment to detect and characterize accretion for a wide range of ice crystal icing (ICI) conditions conducted in the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) cascade rig. Their data along with visual observations of the accretion surface showed the rig environment to be effective in simulating the accretion observed in the engine in both coverage and morphology, although the initial growth rate in the rig was slower than that seen in the engine. This work also examined the accretion shed characteristics of ICI where in some scenarios, the UIAS and temperature data were able to show accreted ice lifting off the surface, but not shedding, and then continued to grow while being pinned to other component features. A new UIAS detection algorithm was also investigated and applied to a range of ICI test conditions. In all cases, the UIAS’s were very sensitive to accretion and provided early detection where only small islands of localized ice growth were visible at the point of detection in both wetbulb>0oC and supercooled ICI environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIAA AVIATION 2022 ForumSame topicIcing and De-icing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207