MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283365117 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2022.135

P.033 Detection of Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Immunoglobulin G (MOG-IgG) by live and fixed cell-based assays

2022· article· en· W4283365117 on OpenAlexaffvenue
P Kumar, A Cruz, Harvir Sodhi, P Waters, V Victor Mgbachi, M Woodhall, A Mousavi, Joél Oger, Tougan Abdel Aziz, H Frykman

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Canadian institutionsVancouver Biotech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMultiple sclerosisMyelin oligodendrocyte glycoproteinAntibodyImmunologyPathologyExperimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: MOG-IgG is associated with non-MS demyelinating disease of the optic nerves, spinal cord and brain. Specificity has been issue so we validated the live and fixed MOG-IgG CBAs against the Oxford Autoimmune Neurology Diagnostic Laboratory (OANG) live CBA as a comparator with high specificity. Methods: At BC Neuroimmunology lab (BCNI), 54 MOG-IgG serum samples previously positive by live-CBA at OANG and BCNI were blindly tested by commercial fixed CBA. All 54 MOG IgG positives came from MOG-IgG positive patients. In addition, 256 samples from healthy people and other neurolgic disease were tested. Results: The live MOG-IgG CBA performed at BCNI was 100% concordant (54/54) with OANG live CBA. In contrast, only 49/54 samples were found seropositive by the commercial fixed CBA. The BCNI live-CBA identified 3/256 control samples as positive while 6/256 controls were positive on the fixed commercial CBA. On this cohort the live CBA is 100% sensitive, 98.8% specific and has PPV of 95%. The commercial fixed MOG test is 91% sensitive, 97.6% specific and has PPV of 87.5%. Conclusions: BCNI live MOG-IgG CBAs are in 100% agreement with MOG-IgG. Three positive results in non-MOGAD associated clinical phenotype require further investigation. These data confirm the superiority of the live MOG CBA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicPeripheral Neuropathies and DisordersFrench-language works237,207