Adult-Onset Pilocytic Astrocytoma Predilecting Temporal Lobe: A Brief Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(1) Introduction: Adult-onset pilocytic astrocytoma (APA) accounts for only 1.5% of all brain tumors, and studies regarding APA are limited. This review is focused on the history, clinical course, cytogenetics, neuroimaging features, management, and outcome of APAs. (2) Methods: Using a systematic search protocol in Google Scholar, PubMed, and Science Direct databases, the authors extracted cases of APA predilecting the temporal lobe from inception to December 2020. Articles lacking necessary data were excluded from this study. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 23 statistical package software. (3) Results: A total of 32 patients, 14 (43.8%) males and 18 (56.2%) females, with a male/female ratio of 0.77/1, were grouped. The mean age of the patients was 34.22 ± 15.17 years, ranging from 19 to 75. The tumors were predominantly located in the left side. We have also discussed the clinical presentation, and headache was the most common complaint, followed by visual disturbance. Preoperative neuroimaging features demonstrated cystic lesions in 16 patients, with mural nodule in 5 patients; intracerebral hemorrhage was present in 1 patient, and solid enhancing mass was observed in 3 patients. Only our reported case presented as a solid calcified mass. Most of the patients (78.1%) underwent a gross total resection (GTR), only 5 (21.9%) underwent subtotal resection (STR). The outcome and prognosis history were excellent, and no recurrence was observed. (4) Conclusion: Most of the APAs of the temporal lobe follow benign clinical courses, but some patients exhibit aggressive clinical behavior. There was no history of recurrence after treatment at up to 27 years of follow-up.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".